What I find interesting is, that the
best work that Dr. Judy Mikovits has published in her life –
Table 4 from the Addendum – is being ignored both by her critics and her defenders. There are several statements from Dr. Mikovits that directly contradict the content of table 4 – one has just to take some time and look.
And the Addendum was written by Dr. Mikovits –
not by Dr. Lombardi. And the best part: Dr. Silverman isn't even mentioned in the Addendum.
And mind you, you need to just gather statements and publications by
only Dr. Mikovits. That fine reseacher can't make a factual statement without contradicting herself. To me, this looks like a web of lies – your milage may vary. And now my dear
anoymice anonymouses, go and email this post to your best friends, and tell them I am smearing Mikovits again. And please don't read table 4 from the Addendum. Never ever do that – because you might end up smearing the fine Dr. Judy Mikovits.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are most welcome! But please:
- No SPAM whatsoever, no supplements, no pharmaceuticals, no herbs or any other advertisements
- Absolutely no quack-doctors pushing their quack-BS websites (and if you are a quack, I will call you out)
- Be critical if you want to, but try to be coherent
Comments are moderated, because I am tired of Gerwyn-V99-The-Idiot and his moronic sockpuppets, and tired of the story of the two dogs, but I will try to publish everything else.
If you are not Gerwyn (and want to tell me something other than the story of the two dogs), then relax and write something! :-)