Well the monoclonal antibodies and the antibodies that have been validated, the 7C10, I haven’t seen the other assays clinically validated to detect a clinical sample. They are very highly specific against expressed XMRV proteins from VP62, a reference standard that, you know, so far hasn’t been detected in a natural isolate as prevalently as some of the other variation that one would expect in a retrovirus.VP62 hasn't been detected in a natural isolate as prevalently as some of the other variation that one would expect in a retrovirus? It hasn't been detected? It hasn't been detected? It hasn't been detected? It hasn't been detected? And what "other variation" one would "expect"?
http://www.facebook.com/notes/xmrv-global-action/transcript-of-the-1st-international-xmrv-workshop-qa/438284026796
http://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=9582
(after minute 35)
Pages
▼
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are most welcome! But please:
- No SPAM whatsoever, no supplements, no pharmaceuticals, no herbs or any other advertisements
- Absolutely no quack-doctors pushing their quack-BS websites (and if you are a quack, I will call you out)
- Be critical if you want to, but try to be coherent
Comments are moderated, because I am tired of Gerwyn-V99-The-Idiot and his moronic sockpuppets, and tired of the story of the two dogs, but I will try to publish everything else.
If you are not Gerwyn (and want to tell me something other than the story of the two dogs), then relax and write something! :-)