First of all, let me open by saying that skeptics can do a a brilliant job at dissecting scientific fields. Some of the people I admire (for their informed opinion in one field) are skeptics.
However, I have seen by now quite a few skeptics (self declared and otherwise) who are very good or even brilliant in one field – and whom I would even consider based on the quality of their argument to be authorities in their field – who on the other hand are utterly daft idiots led by confirmation bias in other fields and whose word should not be trusted. A nice combination I have seen is "climate science" and "politics" – usually those who are good in "climate science" are idiots when it comes to "politics" (and vice versa).
Therefore I think the problem with skeptics is as follows: Most skeptics are firmly placed in "their camp", and only skeptical of "the other camp". If the position of "their" camp is close to reality, skeptics can really shine. If, however the position of their camp is BS, then skeptics are lost.
So I guess the label "skeptic" creates a problem. I think the solution what was once called "Materialism", which is now being rebranded as "Naturalism": An improvement of the approximate representation of reality as it exists.
Do "evolutionary novel" foods harm the health of a few/some/many/most people? Let's find out! Is the Earth's climate on the verge of collapse due to human CO2 emissions? Let's find out!
Instead, what I see with many skeptics is once they have "settled" in a field, then most skeptics tend to be quite "partisan". Their critical zeal is limited to the "other side", their own side gets a free pass time and time again. They no longer thrive for the better grasp of reality – their skepticism has vanished it seems. They limit themselves to communicating their position (or rather bawling it out into the world) – as if life were a "debate club". No matter how good your argument, the Earth is neither flat nor hollow. If you want to shout me down, that the Earth is hollow, and that the bible is right, and that the climate is collapsing, and that government is the source of all evil, and that saturated fat is evil, and that there is an "electric universe", then I will leave such a debate. You "win". But that doesn't mean you are "right", that doesn't mean that what you say is an approximate representation of reality. And it means that your "skeptical" position is quite a contradiction in terms.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
5-AZA A. Melvin Ramsay Acne Advocacy Alan Light Alternative medicine is an untested danger Ampligen Andrew Wakefield Anecdote Anthony Komaroff Antibiotics Antibodies Anxiety Aphthous Ulcers Apnea Asthma Autism Autoimmune Disease Behçet’s Ben Katz Bertrand Russell Biology Blood sugar Bruce Carruthers Caffeine Calcium Cancer Capitalism Cardiology Carmen Scheibenbogen CBT/GET CDC Celiac Disease Cereal Grains CFIDS Chagas Charité Charles Lapp Christopher Snell Chronix Clinician Coconut Milk Cognition Common Sense and Confirmation Bias Conversion Disorder Coxiella Burnetii Coxsackie Criteria Crohn's Cushing's Syndrome Cytokine Daniel Peterson Darwinism David Bell Depression Diabetes Diagnostic Differential Disease Diseases of Affluence DNA DNA Sequencing Dog DSM5 EBV EEG Eggs Elaine DeFreitas Elimination Diet Enterovirus Epstein-Barr ERV Etiology Evolution Exercise Challenge Faecal Transplant Fame and Fraud and Medical Science Fatigue Fatty Acids Fibromyalgia Francis Ruscetti Fructose Gene Expression Genetics Giardia Gordon Broderick Gulf War Illness Gut Microbiome Harvey Alter Health Care System Hemispherx Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Herpesviridae High Blood Pressure Historic Outbreaks HIV HPV Hyperlipid Ian Hickie Ian Lipkin Immune System Infection Intermittent Fasting It's the environment stupid Jacob Teitelbaum Jamie Deckoff-Jones Jo Nijs John Chia John Coffin John Maddox José Montoya Judy Mikovits Karl Popper Kathleen Light Kenny De Meirleir Lactose Lamb Laszlo Mechtler LCMV Lecture Leonard Jason Leukemia Life Liver Loren Cordain Low Carb Low-Dose Naltrexone (LDN) Luc Montagnier Lucinda Bateman Ludicrous Notions Lumpers and Splitters Lyme Mady Hornig Mark Hasslett Martin Lerner Mary Schweitzer MCS ME/CFS Medical Industry Medicine is not based on anecdotes Michael Maes Migraine Milk and Dairy Mitochondria MMR Money and Fame and Fraud MRI Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Multiple Sclerosis Mutton My Symptoms n-1 Nancy Klimas Narcolepsy Neurodermitis Neuroscience NK-Cell Nocebo NSAID Nutrition Obesity On Nutrition Pain Paleo Parathyroid Pathogen Paul Cheney PCR Pharmaceutical Industry Picornavirus Placebo Polio Post Exertional Malaise POTS/OI/NMH PTSD PUFA Q Fever Quote Rare Disease Research Retrovirus Rheumatoid Arthritis Rituximab RNA Robert Gallo Robert Lustig Robert Silverman Robert Suhadolnik Rosario Trifiletti Sarah Myhill Sarcasm Science Sequencing Seth Roberts Shrinks vs. Medicine Shyh-Ching Lo Simon Wessely Sinusitis Sjögren's Somnolence Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik Speculation Stanislaw Burzynski Statins Stefan Duschek Study Sucrose Sugar Supplements Symptoms T1DM T2DM There is no such thing as Chronic Lyme There is no such thing as HGRV Thyroid Tinitus To Do Toni Bernhard Tourette's Treatment Tuberculosis Vaccine Video Vincent Lombardi Vincent Racaniello Virus Vitamin B Vitamin D VP62 When Evidence Based Medicine Isn't Whooping Cough Wolfgang Lutz WPI XMRV You fail science forever