Sunday, February 12, 2012

Discussion of the 33 PCR negative patient samples

This was the initial post.

As my following response was moderated on PhoenixRising, I post it here for documentation:
The problem is that you were not around in late 2009 when we were all asking these questions and missed the long threads as we worked through all these issues. I don't know if the patients who asked all the similar questions to yourself are still on this board or if they departed to other pastures.

It's rather like stepping into a party after a long conversation has taken place and then hoping someone will do a recap of what was said earlier on.

Sorry, I am not trying to fob you off and not trying to pretend that all questions were answered to our satisfaction. You are posing things that were asked at the time and I hope that someone will go back through those threads and find the answers for you and let you know. Lots of discussion on patient numbers and why they were different / didn't add up.

I just hope that someone has the physical / mental strength to do this or you find the relevant bits as I am really struggling right now.[/QUOTE]
Yes, that would be helpful. There was the original thread about the addendum, [URL=""]where Max Pfost promised that a correction would be posted[/URL].

[QUOTE=madmax;106754][QUOTE=V99;106706]Madmax, are there 8 patients missing from the addendum?[/QUOTE]

Yeah I noticed that, also noticed that they put the wrong version up. Should be changed soon.[/QUOTE]

But nothing happened.

[QUOTE=currer;238229]Hi Tony,

As it is quiet on the forum at the moment, why not take the opportunity to go through the older threads fron 2009/10 on XMRV and follow the discussions there? I agree with ukxmrv that it is important to know some of the history of the debate.

I remember the early discussions as being very interesting and informative.[/QUOTE]

See above. The missing patients were noted (but not the the other problems I wrote about, as far as I can see). It was promised that the corrected data would be published. That didn't happen, as far as I can see.

If some researcher wants to look at what Dr. Mikovits has published, should he go through forums and search the internet for corrections? No, corrections should be published were the original material was published. I don't see this has happened.

ETA Tony, with just a bit of expansion, your OP would make a great blog post on PR. Have you thought about that?[/QUOTE]

That might be nice, [B]but I want to be sure that it wasn't [U][I]me[/I][/U] that made a false interpretation[/B].

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are most welcome! But please:

- No SPAM whatsoever, no supplements, no pharmaceuticals, no herbs or any other advertisements

- Absolutely no quack-doctors pushing their quack-BS websites (and if you are a quack, I will call you out)

- Be critical if you want to, but try to be coherent

Comments are moderated, because I am tired of Gerwyn-V99-The-Idiot and his moronic sockpuppets, and tired of the story of the two dogs, but I will try to publish everything else.

If you are not Gerwyn (and want to tell me something other than the story of the two dogs), then relax and write something! :-)


5-AZA A. Melvin Ramsay Acne Advocacy Alan Light Alternative medicine is an untested danger Ampligen Andrew Wakefield Anecdote Anthony Komaroff Antibiotics Antibodies Anxiety Aphthous Ulcers Apnea Asthma Autism Autoimmune Disease Behçet’s Ben Katz Bertrand Russell Biology Blood sugar Bruce Carruthers Caffeine Calcium Cancer Capitalism Cardiology Carmen Scheibenbogen CBT/GET CDC Celiac Disease Cereal Grains CFIDS Chagas Charité Charles Lapp Christopher Snell Chronix Clinician Coconut Milk Cognition Common Sense and Confirmation Bias Conversion Disorder Coxiella Burnetii Coxsackie Criteria Crohn's Cushing's Syndrome Cytokine Daniel Peterson Darwinism David Bell Depression Diabetes Diagnostic Differential Disease Diseases of Affluence DNA DNA Sequencing Dog DSM5 EBV EEG Eggs Elaine DeFreitas Elimination Diet Enterovirus Epstein-Barr ERV Etiology Evolution Exercise Challenge Faecal Transplant Fame and Fraud and Medical Science Fatigue Fatty Acids Fibromyalgia Francis Ruscetti Fructose Gene Expression Genetics Giardia Gordon Broderick Gulf War Illness Gut Microbiome Harvey Alter Health Care System Hemispherx Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Herpesviridae High Blood Pressure Historic Outbreaks HIV HPV Hyperlipid Ian Hickie Ian Lipkin Immune System Infection Intermittent Fasting It's the environment stupid Jacob Teitelbaum Jamie Deckoff-Jones Jo Nijs John Chia John Coffin John Maddox José Montoya Judy Mikovits Karl Popper Kathleen Light Kenny De Meirleir Lactose Lamb Laszlo Mechtler LCMV Lecture Leonard Jason Leukemia Life Liver Loren Cordain Low Carb Low-Dose Naltrexone (LDN) Luc Montagnier Lucinda Bateman Ludicrous Notions Lumpers and Splitters Lyme Mady Hornig Mark Hasslett Martin Lerner Mary Schweitzer MCS ME/CFS Medical Industry Medicine is not based on anecdotes Michael Maes Migraine Milk and Dairy Mitochondria MMR Money and Fame and Fraud MRI Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Multiple Sclerosis Mutton My Symptoms n-1 Nancy Klimas Narcolepsy Neurodermitis Neuroscience NK-Cell Nocebo NSAID Nutrition Obesity On Nutrition Pain Paleo Parathyroid Pathogen Paul Cheney PCR Pharmaceutical Industry Picornavirus Placebo Polio Post Exertional Malaise POTS/OI/NMH PTSD PUFA Q Fever Quote Rare Disease Research Retrovirus Rheumatoid Arthritis Rituximab RNA Robert Gallo Robert Lustig Robert Silverman Robert Suhadolnik Rosario Trifiletti Sarah Myhill Sarcasm Science Sequencing Seth Roberts Shrinks vs. Medicine Shyh-Ching Lo Simon Wessely Sinusitis Sjögren's Somnolence Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik Speculation Stanislaw Burzynski Statins Stefan Duschek Study Sucrose Sugar Supplements Symptoms T1DM T2DM There is no such thing as Chronic Lyme There is no such thing as HGRV Thyroid Tinitus To Do Toni Bernhard Tourette's Treatment Tuberculosis Vaccine Video Vincent Lombardi Vincent Racaniello Virus Vitamin B Vitamin D VP62 When Evidence Based Medicine Isn't Whooping Cough Wolfgang Lutz WPI XMRV You fail science forever